Jump to content


Photo

Proof that the STRV 103 B is a MBT


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 i love tanks

i love tanks

    Lieutenant

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 196 posts
  • HomeBorgotaro (provincia di Parma) Italy

Posted 10 July 2017 - 09:56 AM

There were a few people that were saying that the STRV 103 B was a tank destroyer...and they was wrong...that doesn't mean if it doesn't have a turret it's a tank destroyer..infact its a MBT as writed here
Screenshot_2017-07-10-19-47-50.png
Swiggity swooty Im coming for your booty (づ ̄ ³ ̄)づ http://www6.flamingt....gif&_loc=image

#2 Error 403

Error 403

    Flawless Life

  • General Community Representative
  • 3271 posts
  • HomeThe oil land, or better known as Norway.

Posted 10 July 2017 - 09:59 AM

Wikipedia is not a trusted source, as it can be edited by anyone. Different more trusted sources say otherwise, that this tank is indeed a tank destroyer, but the same goes for the opposite. I think we should ask Altank, who is Swedish himself and a big fan of tanks and military stuff.

However, please, ensure to create topics in the appropriate (sub)sections of the forum, in this particular case, in the "NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Units" section, belonging to the "In-game Vehicles Area" of the forum, as clearly stated in the current administrative guidelines concerning the forum structure. Repeated failure to abide by these guidelines will be considered as trolling and we will therefore act accordingly, resulting in moderating measures being undertaken.

The topic has been moved to the appropriate section of the forum.


Kind regards;
Error 403
TECMAT (Tanktastic English Community MAnagement Team)


  • Iluvtanks and Smigstank like this

u0KGBYG.gif

:: General Community Representative ::
 Forum Rules  EULA  Support  In-game Reports 


#3 Drestdave

Drestdave

    Wikia Administrator - TECREAT Manager

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1081 posts
  • HomeHolland

Posted 10 July 2017 - 10:36 AM

Let me guess, Greenoak is the "few people"?


|Wikia Administrator & TECREAT manager|

​|1200 days In-game|Can be found In-game and on the forums frequently|

   Can I help you with something?


#4 i love tanks

i love tanks

    Lieutenant

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 196 posts
  • HomeBorgotaro (provincia di Parma) Italy

Posted 10 July 2017 - 12:52 PM

No even more.. not just him
Swiggity swooty Im coming for your booty (づ ̄ ³ ̄)づ http://www6.flamingt....gif&_loc=image

#5 Iluvtanks

Iluvtanks

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1913 posts

Posted 10 July 2017 - 01:25 PM

The STRV 103b is refered to as a Main Battle Tank solely for the reason that it performs the same roles as other Main Battle Tanks; this doesn't mean as effectively. If it weren't for the Swedish doctrine, it would be refered to as a Self-Propelled Tank Destroyer because of a variety of reasons.

Firstly, it's turretless design, with the gun mounted in the hull is a common factor of design for any given Tank Destroyer; there are an array of turreted Tank Destroyers, but, most are usually restricted in their traverse or have other factors that influence the fact that they are Tank Destroyers. Secondly, Main Battle Tanks or MBT's are tasked with performing on the front-line, usually fully exposed, in 1 verses 1 combat; whereas Tank Destroyers are second-line supporters, known for their high-powered or high-velocity, high-penetration guns; their concealment; and their lack of armor or over-abundance of armor, such that they're impractical for constant moving. The STRV shares all these traits, it equips with the 90mm,105mm, or 120mm smooth bore guns, it's low-sillouette makes it easy to camouflage in rolling hills (much like that of Sweden) and it lacks armor, making it less than adequate for close-quarters tank on tank combat; not to mention it's lack of a turret makes it less than useless in close-proximity fighting, as it is easily flankable. Conclusively, you can argue that the STRV 103b is a Main Battle Tank because of how they're used by their crew in combat, but, I believe they're almost less than adequate enough for the MBT status, as, it's obsolete to any other turreted MBT out there in today's world. Hence Sweden now uses the Leopard 2, which they imported from Germany in 1977 and upgraded to the Stridsvagn 122. Thank you for listening.

Humble regards;
Iluvtanks (TECREAT Management)
  • rcmppolice likes this

#6 blitzkrieg101

blitzkrieg101

    Field Marshal

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 614 posts
  • HomeTanktastic 4ever

Posted 10 July 2017 - 03:08 PM

And yet, all that reasoning for nothing. It's a swedish tank, and they classified it, how they classified it. As an MBT. Not that I know anything, but I have like 10 tabs open on this thing. And tho a lot of talk about how it should be classified, they also say how it is. And I guess definites are better..


Here's the thing, I'm a nice person. So if I'm a b**** to you, you need to ask yourself why.

"Don't kill people with kindness because not everyone deserves your kindness. Kill people with silence because not everyone deserves your attention."

"Speak your mind, no one else is going to do it for you."


#7 Iluvtanks

Iluvtanks

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1913 posts

Posted 10 July 2017 - 04:14 PM

And yet, all that reasoning for nothing. It's a swedish tank, and they classified it, how they classified it. As an MBT. Not that I know anything, but I have like 10 tabs open on this thing. And tho a lot of talk about how it should be classified, they also say how it is. And I guess definites are better..

People can call it an MBT all they want, for whatever reasons they have, but, everything about it still strongly indicates it's a Self-Propelled Tank Destroyer. It's only classified as an MBT because the Swedish designated it that role; and, I'm telling you, the Swedish Doctrine was wrong. 



#8 blitzkrieg101

blitzkrieg101

    Field Marshal

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 614 posts
  • HomeTanktastic 4ever

Posted 10 July 2017 - 07:03 PM

People can call it an MBT all they want, for whatever reasons they have, but, everything about it still strongly indicates it's a Self-Propelled Tank Destroyer. It's only classified as an MBT because the Swedish designated it that role; and, I'm telling you, the Swedish Doctrine was wrong. 

And yet?


Here's the thing, I'm a nice person. So if I'm a b**** to you, you need to ask yourself why.

"Don't kill people with kindness because not everyone deserves your kindness. Kill people with silence because not everyone deserves your attention."

"Speak your mind, no one else is going to do it for you."


#9 Iluvtanks

Iluvtanks

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1913 posts

Posted 11 July 2017 - 01:10 PM

And yet?

I don't see your point?




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

{parse template="include_lightbox_real" group="global" params=""} {parse template="inlineLogin" group="global" params=""}