Jump to content


Photo

T72 Adra


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 eclipz52

eclipz52

    Private

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 07 May 2017 - 04:58 PM

Though there possibly will never be a visual model update, don't you think this is dope? 

maxresdefault.jpg


Edited by eclipz52, 07 May 2017 - 05:02 PM.

  • Drestdave and EquablezMonsterz like this

#2 randy12345

randy12345

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8407 posts
  • HomeBorn in Leeds, England (Used to be NYC, now's Newark, New Jersey)

Posted 08 May 2017 - 06:34 AM

There is too many T-72 variants to be even specific.

 

Also, it has been confirmed visual upgrades are planned to come SoonTM . So don't get your hopes down.


Bow down to my dank memes.


#3 je4n10

je4n10

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • HomeLebanon

Posted 08 May 2017 - 07:01 AM

There is too many T-72 variants to be even specific.

Also, it has been confirmed visual upgrades are planned to come SoonTM . So don't get your hopes down.

there prob will be t72 variants BUT prob not this variant , its going to be the B line like aka till the t72b3M
git gud noob

#4 EquablezMonsterz

EquablezMonsterz

    Warrant Officer

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts
  • HomeIm burning in vegas send water.

Posted 08 May 2017 - 03:51 PM

Sadly, though using my context clues I don't think any vehicles with caged armor can be put in the game currently, only reactive armor. That is unless visual modifications are added, but this likely won't affect the gameplay dramatically.

                                                            Equablez Burning Through the Battlefield 🔥,  forums, and his Wallet!

                                        


#5 basmal121

basmal121

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2581 posts
  • Homev1.22

Posted 09 May 2017 - 07:10 AM

Unnecessary textures... TankTastic v3 sized 2.5 GB

29dekvt.jpg


#6 randy12345

randy12345

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8407 posts
  • HomeBorn in Leeds, England (Used to be NYC, now's Newark, New Jersey)

Posted 09 May 2017 - 07:16 AM

Sadly, though using my context clues I don't think any vehicles with caged armor can be put in the game currently, only reactive armor. That is unless visual modifications are added, but this likely won't affect the gameplay dramatically.

That'll be one of the easiest things.


Bow down to my dank memes.


#7 Altank

Altank

    ~Everlasting Alpha~

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • HomeFrom the lands where the ground never thaws; beneath the scorched sky, where the clouds are torn and rent.

Posted 09 May 2017 - 08:47 AM

The T-72 Mahmia won't be added to game: it's just an aesthetically-appealing improvised modification aimed at improving tank protection in an urban environment, mainly against ATGMs and portable anti-tank systems. For the records, it embarrassingly failed under almost any circumstances.

 

Current planned modifications for the Tier VI Russian/Soviet platform include:

  • T-72A (Battle Level 51)
  • T-72B (Battle Level 55)
  • T-72B3 (Battle Level 60)

But there will of course be "foreign" T-72 variants for other tech branches like the M-95 Degman, part of the M84 platform; just not this kind of ones.


  • basmal121 likes this

7TPwwPK.gif

~Dura Lex, Sed Lex~

~Ignorantia Legis non excusat~

~Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.~


#8 basmal121

basmal121

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2581 posts
  • Homev1.22

Posted 09 May 2017 - 11:14 AM

gg, topic shall be locked

29dekvt.jpg


#9 magic ender11

magic ender11

    Captain

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 236 posts
  • HomeUnited Kingdom

Posted 09 May 2017 - 11:19 AM

The tank that you are suggesting is basically a T-72A but with ATGM fencing, it could be a upgrade but slightly de-scaled, also it has slightly low end suspension making it even more hull down that it currently is also it would be much more simpler if it literally had fencing that is completely flat, not sticking out from about a meter.

Also it's not a completely different tank it's just a bit more equipped for the battle environment.

Best Regards,


ve43gw.gif


Joined 2014-Jun


#10 EquablezMonsterz

EquablezMonsterz

    Warrant Officer

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts
  • HomeIm burning in vegas send water.

Posted 09 May 2017 - 03:16 PM

U know this actually reminds me of my last entry about the T-55 "Enigma", both were based off Russian tanks, both were modified middle eastern designs, both were designed to defend against ATGMs but failed miserably.


                                                            Equablez Burning Through the Battlefield 🔥,  forums, and his Wallet!

                                        


#11 je4n10

je4n10

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • HomeLebanon

Posted 10 May 2017 - 06:24 AM

The T-72 Mahmia won't be added to game: it's just an aesthetically-appealing improvised modification aimed at improving tank protection in an urban environment, mainly against ATGMs and portable anti-tank systems. For the records, it embarrassingly failed under almost any circumstances.

Current planned modifications for the Tier VI Russian/Soviet platform include:

  • T-72A (Battle Level 51)
  • T-72B (Battle Level 55)
  • T-72B3 (Battle Level 60)
But there will of course be "foreign" T-72 variants for other tech branches like the M-95 Degman, part of the M84 platform; just not this kind of ones.
why is the highest one not the t72b3M aka t72b4?
git gud noob

#12 randy12345

randy12345

    Supreme Commander

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8407 posts
  • HomeBorn in Leeds, England (Used to be NYC, now's Newark, New Jersey)

Posted 10 May 2017 - 07:00 AM

why is the highest one not the t72b3M aka t72b4?

Because It's too close to the T-90, making it pointless to buy it?

 

Or people might confuse them both?


Bow down to my dank memes.





0 user(s) are browsing this forum

{parse template="include_lightbox_real" group="global" params=""} {parse template="inlineLogin" group="global" params=""}