tr85m-1 is a upgraded t55....

Hard to Play Top Tier
#23
Posted 13 December 2016 - 01:53 PM
Update came out 2 weeks ago, how's that not early.The devs need some rest.
I do not think the developers know what resting is.
(☞ ͡ ͡° ͜ ʖ ͡ ͡°)☞
Edited by basmal121, 13 December 2016 - 01:53 PM.
#24
Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:23 AM
so in easy words you think devolpers are idiots and they put tanks without any reserch on them. Its take their long time and reserch and alot of testing pase after they add an tank to the game and compare it to all not 1 tank....hmmmmm? abrams , amx56,t90 and leo2 are alot better than al khalid and arjun irl. why even try to compare. all of them are mbts but even between mbts theres a difference.MBT:main battle tanks*
Thanks
Your kind friend
Khan gtr
Edited by khan, 14 December 2016 - 05:39 AM.

🌷💲👑UNIT👑💲🌷
#25
Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:36 AM
..... *sight* .... khan im talking about an arjun being better than a m1a2 abrams? no way in hell thats possible and yes stats are badly put. even troll games dont make an indian tank better than american /french /russian. its just trolling no matter how you look at it. and i think that for 2.0, stats where thrown around randomlyso in easy words you think devolpers are idiots and they put tanks without any reserch on them. Its take their long time and reserch and alot of testing pase after they add an tank to the game and compare it to all not 1 tank..
Thanks
Your kind friend
Khan gtr
#26
Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:41 AM
agree on fire power of arjun is way high than abrams.and mobility to...... *sight* .... khan im talking about an arjun being better than a m1a2 abrams? no way in hell thats possible and yes stats are badly put. even troll games dont make an indian tank better than american /french /russian. its just trolling no matter how you look at it. and i think that for 2.0, stats where thrown around randomly
Edited by khan, 14 December 2016 - 05:42 AM.

🌷💲👑UNIT👑💲🌷
#28
Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:49 AM
about the al khalid its cost me 2 armata ..to buy it and upgrade it ..i found it more expensive tank i ever buy in TT..but still level 65 and no atm luncher in real life its able to lunch anti tanks atm..its the most OP tank in tt rn. OP dpm , OP health ...... even al khalid is too OPand in real life its the contrairy.

🌷💲👑UNIT👑💲🌷
#29
Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:54 AM
yea why make is so expensive and so OP.... and also there are alot of missing modules....about the al khalid its cost me 2 armata ..to buy it and upgrade it ..i found it more expensive tank i ever buy in TT..but still level 65 and no atm luncher in real life its able to lunch anti tanks atm..
Edited by je4n10, 14 December 2016 - 05:55 AM.
#30
Posted 14 December 2016 - 06:00 AM
agree on fire power of arjun is way high than abrams.and mobility to.
I agree Arjun is superior in mobility but Arjun does not have an auto loader means it has to load manually, since in real life the Abram's rate of fire is slow (Abrams doesn't not have an auto loader as well) Arjun's rate of fire may be faster than Abrams. The gun has the same caliber as the gun on Abrams (120mm) plus Abrams is superior in shells so I don't think Arjun's damage should be higher than Abrams.
Edited by JBDD, 14 December 2016 - 06:02 AM.
☆ Playing Tanktastic since December 2012 ☆
☆ [ECA]Elite Command Army ☆
Chief of High Command & Alliance/Junta Supreme Commander
#31
Posted 14 December 2016 - 06:04 AM
ya true but feel bad about abrams.I agree Arjun is superior in mobility but Arjun does not have an auto loader means it has to load manually, since in real life the Abram's rate of fire is slow (Abrams doesn't not have an auto loader as well) Arjun's rate of fire may be faster than Abrams. The gun has the same caliber as the gun on Abrams (120mm) plus Abrams is superior in shells so I don't think Arjun's damage should be higher than Abrams.

🌷💲👑UNIT👑💲🌷
#35
Posted 14 December 2016 - 08:07 AM
The He shells were buffed, you can do above average damage to the sides and rear of the target.e
Do you mean shooting HE shells on Arjun's sides will cause -900 damage?
☆ Playing Tanktastic since December 2012 ☆
☆ [ECA]Elite Command Army ☆
Chief of High Command & Alliance/Junta Supreme Commander
#39
Posted 14 December 2016 - 10:02 PM
Have you ever thought devices become old as time passes? and when that device becomes old, it starts slacking when it tries running modern games? You must be really smart.they must not rest till older iOS devices can have compatibility!
It's your device's problem, not the devs. If you decide to use a potato to run Tanktastic, then don't expect good results, rather than a boiled potato.
Bow down to my dank memes.
#40
Posted 15 December 2016 - 09:02 AM
Have you ever thought devices become old as time passes? and when that device becomes old, it starts slacking when it tries running modern games? You must be really smart.
It's your device's problem, not the devs. If you decide to use a potato to run Tanktastic, then don't expect good results, rather than a boiled potato.
Now I want mashed potatoes.
See what you did Randy? x)
I do agree though, if you run a high-end game on an obsolete device, do you really think it's going to go well for you?
</TheEncryptor> Leader of [STAT] First Responders
STAT's motto: "Mess with one of us, you get all of us."